WaveSwaps
  • About WaveSwaps
  • Tokens
    • tokens.waveswaps.com
    • GBL DEX markets
    • Revamp Tokens - live
    • WaveSwaps Governance
  • DAO Governance
    • DAO in general
    • Recycle Token Pool
  • WSHARE Governance
    • Reports
      • 48-2024
      • 50-2024
  • WS Official
    • Wallets
    • Smart Contracts
    • DEX Liquidity
    • FEE Schedule
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Referral Protocol
    • 2024 Strategy
    • Whitepaper
    • Historical Evolution
      • Open Source & DAO
      • GetonGlobal
        • Crypto Spotlight
        • Price Prediction Game
        • Token Allocation
        • DAO Governance
        • Token Holdings
        • Terms and Conditions
        • Privacy Policy
      • Token Revamp - WAVE
      • Token Recycle - GBL
      • GetonLedger - POA
      • Trading Order
      • Grosh Mining
      • Startup Ecosystem
        • Experimental Projects
        • PronCoin / PronWorld
        • PiplCoin / PiplShare
  • NODES
    • Liquidity Nodes
    • Power Cores
  • SWAPS
    • Cross-Chain Swap
      • DPMC
    • V1 GBL Bot
    • V3 GBL Bot
  • STAKES
    • WAVE Stake
    • GBL Stake
  • DAO Governance
  • PPG GAME
    • Price Prediction Game
  • CORPORATE
    • ⏩Rebranding Wawe >>> Wave
    • 📚Knowledgebase
      • 📗About Decentralization
  • SOCIALS
    • X
    • YouTube
    • Telegram Channel
  • CONTACT
    • Customer Support
    • Transaction Assistance
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. DAO Governance

DAO in general

About DAO Voting Mechanisms

PreviousDAO GovernanceNextRecycle Token Pool

Last updated 5 months ago

DAO Voting Mechanisms

DAOs are decentralized organizations controlled by their members, using blockchain-powered smart contracts for transparency and trust. Various voting mechanisms exist to facilitate decentralized decision-making and community participation.

  1. TOKEN-BASED QUORUM VOTING requires a specific number of members to participate for a proposal to pass.

  2. PERMISSIONED RELATIVE MAJORITY focuses on "for" and "against" votes without a minimum requirement.

  3. RAGE QUITTING incorporates sponsorship and a grace period for voters to withdraw support.

  4. QUADRATIC VOTING ties voting power to financial power.

  5. CONVICTION VOTING aggregates community preferences over time.

  6. HOLOGRAPHIC CONSENSUS combines prediction and betting.

  7. MULTISIG VOTING balances central authority and decentralization.

  8. LIQUID DEMOCRACY delegates voting power to trusted experts.

While no perfect solution exists, each mechanism has its advantages and challenges. As blockchain technology advances and DAOs evolve, new voting mechanisms may emerge or existing ones may be combined for better solutions.

Source:

www.limechain.tech